|
(You are hearing a recording made of a Bigfoot!)
Okay, even if you were to chalk all THAT up to coincidence and native folklore, what about the physical evidence? Some say, "Well, those footprints found are all merely elaborate hoaxes!" Well if that were true that would mean that in order to account for all the literally tens of thousands of footprints that have been discovered to date, it would probable require a team of about 50 or so people working 8 hour days 6 days a week for what? To perpetuate a hoax? And plus that team of 50 people would have to be experts in physical anatomy to construct detailed AND distinct models of forged footprints for every SINGLE individual print. Don't believe it? Well, next time you go to the beach take a walk barefoot in the still wet sand and try and make a track of prints that are all exactly alike!! Pretty tough, huh? Now try to imagine creating a physical device that would simulate the amount of weight that a sasquatch would exert in each step! Now, I bet the "hoax" theory sounds a lot less plausible.
Now, lets suppose another theory. Imagine 100,000 years ago in our evolution there existed a distant ancestor to
Homo sapiens(that's us, people! and that creature was called Gigantopithecus(He really existed, check any anthropology
textbook!) Now, suppose that by some freak or twist of nature this creature, the Gigantopithecus, did not evolve like
our ancestors and instead chose to migrate to the more remote reaches of the landscape, i.e. the snow covered mountains,
the miles of uncharted wilderness. The world is a pretty big place, yes or no. Now in those environments, things like
larger more agile feet, thick hair, and a more acute animal sense was an asset not a deficit and therefore remained in
the genepool. This is not my theory but rather Darwin's theory of natural selection. Would it not be impossible for
these creatures to have ancestors still living today in small populations in the mountains and wildernesses? You be the
judge.
![]() Click me to go somewhere cool! |